Register Today & Receive Free Shipping On All Orders Over $250
Customer Service Hours: Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM EST
0 items$0.00

No products in the cart.

Juvederm and Teosyal Face-off
Teosyal vs Juvederm

Dermal fillers have become a cornerstone in the field of aesthetic medicine. Their rise in popularity is credited to their non-invasive nature and the ability to effectively reduce signs of aging, enhance facial symmetry, and add volume where needed. For medical professionals, choosing the right dermal filler is paramount in ensuring patient satisfaction and the best possible outcomes. Among the top contenders in this market are Juvederm and Teosyal – two brands synonymous with quality, innovation, and efficacy. Both have an array of products designed to cater to different aesthetic needs and expectations. However, the question arises, which one should be the go-to choice for your practice? In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between these leading dermal fillers, discussing everything from their range and material to safety profiles and cost-effectiveness, providing you with the information you need to make an informed decision.

What are Dermal Fillers?

Dermal fillers, a staple in non-surgical cosmetic treatments, are small injections of gel typically composed of hyaluronic acid that fill in wrinkles and add volume to soft tissue. They can be used to smooth out a variety of skin concerns, ranging from fine lines around the eyes and mouth, to deeper wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds or “smile lines”. Beyond addressing wrinkles, dermal fillers are versatile enough to enhance facial contours, define cheekbones, and plump lips, providing a rejuvenated and fresher appearance.

Hyaluronic acid, a naturally occurring substance in the skin, is the primary ingredient in many dermal fillers. It works by drawing in moisture and delivering nutrients to the skin, thereby promoting skin health and elasticity. Over time, the body metabolically processes the hyaluronic acid, leading to the gradual decrease of the filler’s effect, necessitating subsequent treatments.

The fundamental appeal of dermal fillers lies in their ability to offer significant aesthetic improvements without invasive surgical procedures. Unlike traditional surgical interventions, dermal filler treatments require minimal downtime and can often be completed within an hour. Furthermore, the results are usually immediately noticeable and adjustable to patient’s preferences, contributing to their growing popularity in the realm of aesthetic medicine.

While dermal fillers offer a wide range of uses, their implementation should always be tailored to the patient’s unique needs and expectations. This requires an intimate understanding of the facial anatomy, the aging process, and the subtle artistry required to enhance one’s natural beauty. It’s crucial for medical professionals to be versed in a wide array of fillers and their specific properties, allowing them to customize treatments to provide optimal results. This is where understanding the difference between leading dermal filler brands, such as Juvederm and Teosyal, becomes instrumental.

Dermal fillers are not without risks. Even though they are generally considered safe, potential side effects include redness, swelling, bruising at the injection site, and in rare cases, more serious complications like infection, allergic reaction, or lumps and bumps in the treated areas. As such, dermal filler treatments should always be performed by qualified professionals, who can properly assess a patient’s suitability for the treatment, manage their expectations, and effectively mitigate potential risks.

About Juvederm and Teosyal

In the world of aesthetic medicine, few names ring as true and trusted as Juvederm and Teosyal. Both have carved out significant market shares, each with a unique set of features and benefits that have earned them worldwide renown.


Juvederm, a line of dermal fillers produced by Allergan, a global pharmaceutical company, has been a mainstay in the field of cosmetic procedures for well over a decade. First introduced to the market in 2006, Juvederm has earned a reputation for delivering high-quality, reliable results in various facial treatments.

The Juvederm line comprises several products that primarily use hyaluronic acid, a substance naturally present in the human body. These products are designed to smooth out lines, lift and add volume, or enhance facial features like lips and cheeks. They’re praised for their smooth consistency, which allows for a more natural look post-treatment.

What sets Juvederm apart is its Hylacross technology, which gives it a smoother consistency and allows for a more comfortable injection process. More recent iterations of the product, such as the Juvederm Vycross line, use Vycross technology that cross-links the hyaluronic acid at different points, making the gel smoother and longer-lasting.


Teosyal, on the other hand, is a Swiss-made dermal filler line developed by Teoxane Laboratories. With a presence in the market since 2003, Teosyal has positioned itself as a reputable brand in the field of aesthetic medicine. Teosyal products are also primarily based on hyaluronic acid, aiming to fill wrinkles, restore facial volumes, hydrate and rejuvenate the skin, and enhance certain features.

A unique aspect of Teosyal is the use of their patented Resilient Hyaluronic Acid (RHA) technology in their products. RHA technology ensures the hyaluronic acid in their fillers is more resilient to dynamic forces, such as facial movements. This technology helps maintain the filler’s effectiveness while ensuring a natural look and feel when the face is in motion.

Teosyal offers a broad range of products, each tailored to treat specific areas of the face and achieve various aesthetic objectives. Among these products are the Teosyal RHA line, designed for dynamical facial wrinkles and folds, and the Teosyal PureSense line, designed for static wrinkles and for volume enhancement.

Teosyal and Juvederm both stand as pillars in the industry, each with their own sets of strengths, innovative technologies, and specific product lines. However, the true measure of their effectiveness lies not just in their impressive backgrounds and product range, but in the specifics of their material and consistency, their effectiveness and longevity, their safety profiles, and the value they offer for their price – all of which we’ll delve into in the following sections.

It is also worth noting that the choice between Juvederm and Teosyal is often subject to patient characteristics, desired outcomes, and the personal preference of the medical professional, with each brand offering unique attributes that can cater to different needs and preferences. In the hands of an experienced practitioner, both Juvederm and Teosyal can deliver outstanding results, paving the way for more confident, revitalized patients.

Product Range

Dermal fillers, while essentially aimed at a similar end goal – the rejuvenation and enhancement of one’s aesthetic appeal – often vary significantly in their formulation, targeted areas, and application technique. Understanding the product range of two market leaders, Juvederm and Teosyal, can provide invaluable insights for clinicians, allowing them to better cater to their patients’ diverse needs.


Juvederm, a line produced by Allergan, is a prominent name in the world of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. The Juvederm family features a comprehensive range of products, each tailored to address specific areas and concerns.

  • Juvederm Ultra: This range, which includes Ultra and Ultra Plus, is primarily used for facial contouring and the treatment of moderate to severe wrinkles and folds, especially around the nose and mouth.
  • Juvederm Voluma: This is the first filler approved by the FDA for deep injection in the cheek area to correct age-related volume loss. Voluma is often chosen for its ability to restore volume in the cheeks and chin, presenting a youthful and uplifted appearance.
  • Juvederm Volbella: Specifically designed f5or lip augmentation and the correction of perioral lines, Volbella’s smaller HA particles offer a subtle and natural enhancement of the lips.v

Each Juvederm product is formulated with a unique manufacturing process, Vycross technology, which cross-links HA of different molecular weights. This leads to a more durable gel and allows for subtle, long-lasting results.


Teosyal, manufactured by Teoxane Laboratories, is another leading name in the dermal filler market. Like Juvederm, Teosyal also bases its fillers on hyaluronic acid, albeit with slightly different formulations and focuses.

  • Teosyal RHA (Resilient Hyaluronic Acid) Line: This range includes RHA 1, 2, 3, and 4, each intended for different depths and areas of injection. RHA 1 is designed for superficial wrinkles, RHA 2 for moderate wrinkles, RHA 3 for deep wrinkles, and RHA 4 for redefining facial contours and volume. The RHA line is known for its unique resilience and ability to adapt to facial movements.
  • Teosyal Puresense Line: Comprising Redensity I Puresense and Redensity II Puresense, this line focuses on revitalizing and redensifying the skin. Redensity is a light-reflecting product used across the face, neck, and décolletage, while Redensity II is specifically designed to treat the delicate and challenging area under the eyes.
  • Teosyal Ultra Deep: As the name suggests, this filler is used for deep and volumetric facial corrections, creating or restoring facial volumes, and sculpting facial contours.
  • Teosyal Kiss: Designed with a highly elastic formula, this product is ideal for lip augmentation, offering a voluminous yet natural finish.

One unique feature of Teosyal products hyis their reduced protein and bacterial endotoxin level, which results in less hypersensitivity reactions. Moreover, many Teosyal fillers are available with lidocaine, an anesthetic, for a more comfortable injection experience.

While both Juvederm and Teosyal offer a vast array of products to tackle different aesthetic concerns, it’s crucial to remember that the effectiveness of each product can vary greatly depending on the individual patient and the skill and technique of the administering physician. As such, the choice of product often boils down to a clinician’s familiarity with the product, their understanding of the patient’s needs, and the specific aesthetic outcome desired.

Juvederm vs Teosyal Health Supplies Plus

Material and Consistency

The composition of a dermal filler is integral to its functionality and aesthetic outcomes. Here we’ll explore the materials and consistencies of both Juvederm and Teosyal fillers.


Juvederm fillers are created from hyaluronic acid (HA), a naturally occurring sugar in the body that plays a key role in skin hydration and volume. Allergan, the producer of Juvederm, utilizes a proprietary technology called Hylacross to create a smoothly consistent, malleable gel. This unique technology results in a high concentration of cross-linked HA for long-lasting results.

The consistency of Juvederm fillers varies across its product range, enabling a tailored approach for different patient needs and treatment areas. For example, Juvederm Voluma, with its robust, thicker consistency, is designed to add volume to the cheeks, chin, and jawline, while Juvederm Volbella, with its softer and more fluid consistency, is better suited for subtle lip augmentation and smoothing perioral lines.

One key characteristic of Juvederm products is their exceptional smoothness, which many practitioners find facilitates easier injection and more predictable distribution in the skin.


Teosyal fillers, produced by Teoxane Laboratories, are also made from HA. However, they utilize a different proprietary process known as Monophasic Double Cross-Linking to create a homogenous, resilient gel that maintains its integrity over time. The HA used in Teosyal fillers is non-animal sourced and biodegradable, similar to that in Juvederm.

The consistency of Teosyal fillers is designed to match their specific treatment purposes. Teosyal RHA, or Resilient Hyaluronic Acid, is a unique range developed to preserve the natural movement and dynamism of the face. These fillers have a more elastic consistency, allowing them to adapt to the movements of the face while providing subtle, natural-looking volume and contour.

Teosyal Ultra Deep, on the other hand, has a thicker and more cohesive gel consistency, making it ideal for restoring volume to larger areas such as the cheeks and jawline. Teosyal Kiss has a denser formulation perfect for lip augmentation, offering plumpness and definition.

The consistency of Teosyal products is designed for easy injectability and optimal diffusion in the dermal layer. Many practitioners note that the robust cohesivity of Teosyal fillers can help to achieve precise shaping and sculpting during the treatment process.

Effectiveness and Longevity

When considering dermal fillers for your practice, the duration of their effectiveness and the longevity of results are crucial factors. In this regard, both Juvederm and Teosyal have their unique characteristics and benefits.


Juvederm is recognized for its wide range of hyaluronic acid-based fillers, renowned for their impressive longevity. The brand boasts a patented Vycross technology that contributes to a superior lifting capacity and improved duration. This technology involves a unique cross-linking of high and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid, resulting in a more stable and longer-lasting filler.

The longevity of Juvederm products varies, generally lasting from 9 to 24 months, depending on the specific product and the area treated. For instance, the Juvederm Voluma, designed for cheek augmentation, provides noticeable improvements that can last up to two years.

In terms of effectiveness, Juvederm’s range consistently shows immediate results due to its excellent filling capacity. It’s particularly recognized for its ability to fill deep wrinkles, enhance lips, and restore lost volume, all while maintaining a natural appearance.


Teosyal, on the other hand, has distinguished itself with the unique formulation of its fillers that emphasizes natural results and longevity. The Swiss-made brand utilizes a monophasic, non-animal hyaluronic acid, known for its homogeneous, smooth consistency. This consistency enables easy molding after injection and contributes to the longevity of the product.

Teosyal’s product line features the innovative RHA (Resilient Hyaluronic Acid) technology. This range is designed to adapt to the dynamic movements of the face, ensuring a more natural look during facial expressions, which sets it apart in the market.

The effectiveness of Teosyal fillers is visible immediately after the treatment, making them a preferred choice for addressing various aesthetic needs, including smoothing wrinkles, lip augmentation, and facial contouring.

Teosyal fillers are reported to last from 6 to 18 months on average. However, certain products like Teosyal RHA 4, designed for volumizing and treating deeper wrinkles and folds, claim to have lasting effects of up to 24 months.

Juvederm vs Teosyal

Safety and Side Effects

In aesthetic medicine, safety is paramount. While dermal fillers offer transformative potential, it is crucial to understand the safety profiles and potential side effects of these treatments to deliver the best patient care. We’ll take a look at Juvederm and Teosyal in this context.


Juvederm products are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and comply with high safety standards worldwide. The filler contains hyaluronic acid, a naturally occurring substance in the body, minimizing the risk of adverse reactions.

However, like any medical treatment, Juvederm carries the potential for side effects. Common ones are usually mild and include redness, swelling, pain, tenderness, firmness, lumps/bumps, bruising, itching, or discoloration at the injection site. These usually subside within two weeks.

Rare, more severe side effects include allergic reactions, skin necrosis, or lumps developing under the skin. Vision abnormalities or blindness are extremely rare but serious side effects associated with improper administration of facial filler in facial areas. It is critical for providers to have thorough anatomical knowledge and adhere to recommended injection techniques to minimize these risks.


Teosyal, likewise, boasts an impressive safety record, with a high level of biocompatibility due to its non-animal origin and high purity. It also uses hyaluronic acid, which reduces the risk of allergic reactions and minimizes side effects.

Similar to Juvederm, common side effects of Teosyal are typically injection-related and include temporary redness, swelling, pain, itching, bruising or tenderness at the injection site. These effects usually resolve within a few days following injection into the skin, and within a week after the injection into the lips.

More severe but rare side effects may include granulomas, skin necrosis, or allergic reactions. As with all fillers, unintentional injection into a blood vessel can lead to serious complications, which can be permanent. This underlines the importance of administering these treatments under the guidance of highly trained professionals.

Overall, both Juvederm and Teosyal have commendable safety profiles and their side effects are typically mild and temporary. However, it is crucial for healthcare providers to communicate potential risks with patients and take steps to prevent complications, like confirming non-allergy to the filler components, using proper injection techniques, and adhering to all safety protocols. Additionally, the suitability of either product should be determined on an individual patient basis, considering their specific needs, health status, and treatment goals.

Both brands, when used responsibly and correctly, offer a safe method of enhancing facial features and combating signs of aging. Continued training and vigilance in practice are key to ensuring patient safety while delivering desirable aesthetic outcomes. In the hands of qualified and experienced practitioners, Juvederm and Teosyal are valuable tools in the field of aesthetic medicine.

Professional Opinions and Reviews

Medical professionals’ opinions carry weight when considering a dermal filler for a practice, as they provide firsthand experiences of the efficacy, versatility, and patient satisfaction levels of each product. In the realm of Juvederm and Teosyal, these insights are particularly valuable.

Juvederm is renowned for its diverse product line, each tailored to specific aesthetic needs. Professionals appreciate the customization this allows for each patient’s unique facial anatomy and desired outcome. Anecdotal reports from physicians reveal that Juvederm Voluma, for example, is preferred for deep injections into the cheek area to add volume and contour, given its robust and lasting formulation. In contrast, Juvederm Volbella is praised for its ability to provide soft and natural lip augmentation.

Many clinicians have noted the ease of injection with Juvederm products, highlighting the product’s smooth consistency. Furthermore, the inclusion of lidocaine in the product is considered a benefit, enhancing patient comfort during the procedure. Patient satisfaction with Juvederm is reportedly high, with noticeable results immediately post-treatment and generally lasting between 9 to 12 months.

Teosyal, on the other hand, has gained recognition for its high-performance hyaluronic acid fillers. Medical professionals often commend Teosyal for the natural look and feel it imparts, especially in the areas of the face with more movement such as the lips and around the eyes. Teosyal RHA, the brand’s innovative Resilient Hyaluronic Acid range, is particularly lauded for its dynamic nature and capacity to adapt to facial movements while maintaining its filling capacity.

Professionals also report the Teosyal product line exhibits less swelling post-injection compared to other brands, an advantage when it comes to patient comfort and immediate post-treatment appearances. Patients also report a high satisfaction rate with Teosyal fillers, noting their long-lasting effects, with some treatments reported to last up to 18 months, depending on the specific product and treatment area.

In terms of ease of use, some doctors mention a preference for Teosyal’s ergonomic syringe design, which allows for better control during injection. However, this often comes down to personal preference and familiarity with the product.


In conclusion, both Juvederm and Teosyal provide high-quality dermal fillers that have shown consistent results in aesthetic medicine. Each brand offers a broad range of products, catering to a variety of treatment areas, thereby offering flexibility to practitioners and individualized treatment to patients.

While Juvederm has earned a solid reputation for its long-lasting fillers with a smooth consistency, Teosyal stands out for its innovative formula that minimizes swelling and discomfort. The choice between the two often comes down to specific patient needs, aesthetic goals, and the practitioner’s personal preference and familiarity with the product.

Pricing can be another differentiating factor, and practices must balance cost with patient outcomes. Both companies offer competitive pricing within the market, although variances can be found depending on the specific product.

Professional experiences and reviews highlight satisfaction with both brands. However, as with any medical treatment, it’s vital to consider the unique patient case, the desired outcome, and the potential for side effects.

In a nutshell, Juvederm and Teosyal are both leaders in the field of dermal fillers, each with their unique strengths. The decision ultimately depends on an array of factors that should be assessed with a patient-centric approach. This comparison provides a starting point, yet clinical judgement remains paramount.

Please leave your email below and we will notify you when stock for this item has replenished.