The field of aesthetic medicine continues to innovate, offering cosmetic professionals a wider range of treatments to address diverse patient needs. Rejuran and traditional dermal fillers are both popular options, each offering unique benefits. While traditional fillers focus on volume restoration, Rejuran provides regenerative benefits aimed at improving skin health. This article examines the key differences between these treatments, equipping medical professionals with the insights needed to guide patient decisions effectively.
What is Rejuran?
Rejuran is a skin rejuvenation treatment that uses Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN), a substance derived from salmon DNA, known for its regenerative properties. Its primary mechanism involves repairing damaged skin cells, stimulating collagen production, and promoting overall skin health. Unlike volume-enhancing dermal fillers, Rejuran focuses on cellular repair, improving skin elasticity, hydration, and texture over time.
Rejuran is commonly used to address fine lines, enlarged pores, and thin, damaged skin. Its regenerative properties make it ideal for patients seeking subtle, natural-looking improvements in skin quality. Popular in Asian markets, Rejuran is gaining recognition globally for its ability to create the ‘glass skin’ look—smooth, radiant, and youthful.
What Are Traditional Dermal Fillers?
Traditional dermal fillers, such as Juvederm, Restylane, and Belotero, are injectable treatments primarily composed of hyaluronic acid (HA). Their main purpose is to restore facial volume, contour features, and smooth static wrinkles by physically filling spaces beneath the skin’s surface. Unlike Rejuran, which works on cellular repair, fillers deliver immediate aesthetic improvements.
These fillers can plump lips, smooth out under-eye hollows, and define the jawline, making them versatile for enhancing various facial features. With effects lasting anywhere from 6 to 18 months, depending on the product and treatment area, HA fillers are a versatile option for patients seeking dramatic yet natural-looking enhancements.
Key Differences Between Rejuran and Traditional Fillers
Composition
- Rejuran: Composed of PDRN, which has anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties.
- Traditional Fillers: Made of HA, a hydrating molecule that provides volume and structure.
Mechanism of Action
- Repairs and rejuvenates skin at the cellular level by promoting collagen synthesis and improving skin texture.
- Traditional Fillers**: Physically fill volume-deficient areas to restore contour and smooth wrinkles.
Treatment Goals
- Rejuran: Targets overall skin health, including elasticity, hydration, and texture.
- Traditional Fillers: Focuses on immediate volume restoration and wrinkle reduction.
Results Timeline
- Rejuran: Gradual results develop over weeks as the skin regenerates.
- Traditional Fillers: Instant results with visible changes immediately after the procedure.
Indications
- Rejuran: Suitable for patients seeking subtle, natural skin rejuvenation.
- Traditional Fillers: Ideal for patients with volume loss, deep wrinkles, or those seeking dramatic contouring.
Clinical Considerations for Rejuran vs. Traditional Fillers
Patient Selection
Rejuran is ideal for younger patients or those with mild skin concerns who prioritize natural improvements. Conversely, traditional fillers are better suited for individuals with moderate-to-severe volume loss or pronounced wrinkles.
Treatment Protocols
Rejuran typically requires a series of 3-4 treatments spaced 2-4 weeks apart for optimal results. Traditional fillers often achieve desired outcomes in a single session, with periodic touch-ups needed to maintain effects.
Combination Therapies
For patients with complex aesthetic goals, combining Rejuran with traditional fillers can deliver comprehensive results. While Rejuran enhances skin quality, fillers provide the structural support needed for facial contouring.
Side Effects and Downtime
Side effects with Rejuran are usually mild and temporary, like a little redness or swelling that goes away in 1-2 days. Traditional fillers may cause bruising or swelling, with downtime varying depending on the treatment area.
Practical Guidance for Cosmetic Professionals
When determining the right treatment for patients, consider their aesthetic goals, skin condition, and expectations. Rejuran is an excellent choice for preventative care and long-term skin health, while traditional fillers are ideal for patients seeking immediate, targeted enhancements. Educating patients about the benefits of each option can help them make informed decisions and achieve satisfying outcomes.
Conclusion
Rejuran and traditional fillers serve distinct roles in aesthetic medicine, each offering unique benefits to patients. Rather than viewing them as competing treatments, consider their complementary potential. Rejuran’s regenerative properties and traditional fillers’ volume-restoring capabilities can work in harmony to achieve both immediate and long-term aesthetic goals. By incorporating both into your practice, you can elevate patient satisfaction and expand your treatment portfolio. Licensed medical practitioners can buy Rejuran at Health Supplies Plus.
Rejuran Frequently Asked Questions